Concept Symposium 2006 - Principles of Governance for Major Investment Projects

Home
Purpose, topics and program
All presentations
Norway: A Regime for External Quality Assurance of Major Public Projects
Accountable Megaproject Decision-making
United Kingdom: Experiences of Implementing the OGC Gateway Process for Governance of Large Projects
Excellence and Improvisation in Life and Projects – by Way of Jazz
Predictable and Competitive Investment Processes. Experience from the Private Sector and Norwegian Petroleum Industry
Welcome speech by the Pro-Rector of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Canada: Governance of Major Projects – the Case of Quebec
Finland: Governing Major Investment Projects by Result Oriented Budgeting, Reforming Administration and Utilizing Markets Efficiently
Organizational Governance and Project Success: Lessons from Boston’s Big Dig
Improving Quality at Entry – Principles and Procedures
The Governance of Major Projects: Lessons from the Channel Fixed Link
Professional Exchange Sessions
Posters presented at the Poster Session day 2
The Coastal Express and dinner at the Archbishop's Palace
List of all participants
Pictures from the Symposium and the Social Events
About the Concept Program and Contact Information
Click to send an e-mail to the Concept Symposium Director

Organizational Governance and Project Success: Lessons from Boston’s Big Dig



 

Pinto, Jeffrey
Professor
Penn State University
USA
 

Presentation:
Organizational Governance and Project Success: Lessons from Boston’s Big Dig

(If you have problems opening the presentation, right-click the link and choose "Save Target as")
 

Summary of presentation


In attempting to clearly understand the relationship between effective project governance and successful implementation, it is important to contrast accepted practices with an organizational culture that accepts the “normalization of deviance.” When the unexpected becomes the tacitly accepted norm for project performance, it complicates and even negates an organization’s ability to apply meaningful governance to its projects. Using the example of Boston’s recently completed and highly controversial Central Tunnel/Artery project (the “Big Dig”), this presentation will explore the relationship between standard measures of project success and effective governance, particularly when heavily mediated by the politicization of the project.
 

Autobiography


Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh (1986): Research interests include project management, information system implementation, power and political processes in organizations, and the diffusion of innovations. He teaches in the areas of project management, organizational behaviour, and organization theory.

Dr. Pinto is the Andrew Morrow and Elizabeth Lee Black Chair in Technology Management in Penn State’s Black School of Business. The author or editor of 20 books and over 100 scientific papers, he is a two-time recipient of the Distinguished Contribution Award from the Project Management Institute and the Behrend Council of Fellows Research Award. He has consulting experience with a number of major organizations, including General Electric Company, PPG Industries, Aker Rauma Offshore (Finland), Rolls-Royce, Data General Corporation, Erie Press Systems, Repola Oy (Finland), and Zurn Industries.